<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>FPettit.com - Latest Comments in FriendFeed Noise Solutions</title><link>http://fpettit.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:59:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: FriendFeed Noise Solutions</title><link>http://www.fpettit.com/2008/04/25/friendfeed-noise-solutions/#comment-379992</link><description>Now that would go over great with the entire community. I would definitely like the option instead of having people left out. Both views are pretty interesting and could work well for controlling duplicates and for organizational purposes. I just think the person-centric view is more manageable for me :P&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hopefully we can see both options implemented though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Corvida</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:59:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed Noise Solutions</title><link>http://www.fpettit.com/2008/04/25/friendfeed-noise-solutions/#comment-379050</link><description>Franklin - I think you're right.  I could see trying both person-centric and link-centric.  Link-centric would be really interesting, with the one concern that it creates an echo chamber effect.  Everyone focuses only on the link with the most action.  But Techmeme shows there is interest in those kind of approaches.  Perhaps link-centric could be in a separate tab.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bhc3</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:02:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>